There will be prizes awarded to the final 8 people first place being a trip to Atlantic city, one night in a casino hotel and and a buy-in for a tournament.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Johnny Joe's Tournament
The final tournament will be held on Sunday, July 13, at 3:30 for the top 40 people in points.
There will be prizes awarded to the final 8 people first place being a trip to Atlantic city, one night in a casino hotel and and a buy-in for a tournament.
There will be prizes awarded to the final 8 people first place being a trip to Atlantic city, one night in a casino hotel and and a buy-in for a tournament.
Labels:
Atlantic City,
Johnny Joe's,
tournament
Sick Hand#3: The Suckout
Negreanu in a heads up tourny sucks out HARD against Los Angeles Lakers owner Jerry Buss.
Best part of this video is the very last thing Daniel says to Buss right before the video ends....
Best part of this video is the very last thing Daniel says to Buss right before the video ends....
Labels:
negreanu,
poker,
poker hands,
sick
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Chip Trick #3: The Thumb Flip
My favorite thing to do at the table, besides talking shit! :)
via SKD1337
Need more help? Just ask Brandon or Me!
via SKD1337
Need more help? Just ask Brandon or Me!
Monday, June 16, 2008
Checking it Down
A debate arose last night at the BrewHouse about the legality and etiquette of 'checking it down' at the final table when we were down to four players left in the tourny...
I argued wrong, "I don't wear my chaps for the Harley alone" Gary argued correct and said it was illegal. (Gary filled in for Herm last night, and all in all, it was WAY quieter and the tourny ran much more smoother than usual! :)
I always thought saying and agreeing to the other player with more chips "I will check it down" was just bad poker etiquette, however, not only is it bad etiquette, it is illegal, specifically called "explicit collusion" (explicit because it was done in the open as oppossed to implicit collusion, which is in secret or hidden), however, if the two big stacks do not communicate the "checking it down", that is perfectly OK!
I am still looking for more verification on this, but this is the Wiki entry on "Checking it Down":
and another reference by Randy Hudson:
If anyone has more information on this subject, email me or post a comment, I am still not 100% sure of the ruling, but based on the above, it seems to be pointing to illegal!
I argued wrong, "I don't wear my chaps for the Harley alone" Gary argued correct and said it was illegal. (Gary filled in for Herm last night, and all in all, it was WAY quieter and the tourny ran much more smoother than usual! :)
I always thought saying and agreeing to the other player with more chips "I will check it down" was just bad poker etiquette, however, not only is it bad etiquette, it is illegal, specifically called "explicit collusion" (explicit because it was done in the open as oppossed to implicit collusion, which is in secret or hidden), however, if the two big stacks do not communicate the "checking it down", that is perfectly OK!
I am still looking for more verification on this, but this is the Wiki entry on "Checking it Down":
In a poker tournament, when one player is all in and two other players are active in the pot, it is common for the two players with chips left to "check it down". Unless they explicitly communicate an agreement about checking it down, this is not collusion.
and another reference by Randy Hudson:
If you have one all-in player, and two other players who still have stacks left, is it 100% expected that the two "live" players simply check it down?
No, but it's pretty common. The presence of a player whose hand will always be shown down makes bluffing generally inadvisable, and consequently (though less obviously) shifts the hand strength needed for a value bet upward. Each of these makes bets less likely, and so tends to promote a checked-down finish.
When the players are involved in a place-paying tournament or supersatellite, and are near or in the money, that is compounded by the value of eliminating a player. Because both players benefit if either one eliminates the all-in player, bluffs usually have negative value, and the desirability of making value bets goes down even further. This is the situation where most players automatically check it down.
Failing to participate in this "implicit collusion" will draw scorn from some other players. The ones no longer involved in the pot still stand to benefit from elimination of the all-in player, so they also want to see it checked down, as that maximizes the chance of an elimination.
If anyone has more information on this subject, email me or post a comment, I am still not 100% sure of the ruling, but based on the above, it seems to be pointing to illegal!
Friday, June 13, 2008
PA Smoking Ban
SAD DAY FOR SMOKERS BEGINS SEPTEMBER 11th
The smoking ban was passed by our shady mafioso gov, Rendell... This will effect many of us in the poker scene, some happy, some, like me, pissed off as hell... Anyway, did some digging, here are the details:
The smoking ban was passed by our shady mafioso gov, Rendell... This will effect many of us in the poker scene, some happy, some, like me, pissed off as hell... Anyway, did some digging, here are the details:
Residents won’t be able to breathe easier for 90 more days, however, because that’s when the law will go into effect.
But then, smoking will be illegal in most workplaces, in all restaurants and schools, and indoor areas where the public is invited or permitted.
...Business interests demanded that there be some loopholes. So smoking will still be permitted at bars where food sales constitute 20 percent or less of annual revenues; in private clubs; in 25 percent of hotel rooms and all rooms at full-service truck stops.
There may be designated outdoor smoking areas at sports or recreation facilities, theaters or other performance venues. And, in a major bow to the czars of gambling, smoking will still be permitted on up to 25 percent of casino floors or up to 50 percent if a casino can prove to the state Revenue Department that the ban is hurting its bottom line.
Labels:
government,
news,
pennsylvania,
smoking
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)